Author: PRASANNASRI26092001

  • A SOCIO LEGAL ANALYSIS ON THE PERCEPTION/ ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE SAME SEX MARRIAGE IN INDIA

    A SOCIO LEGAL ANALYSIS ON THE PERCEPTION/ ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE SAME SEX MARRIAGE IN INDIA

    AUTHOR – JEEVA, STUDENT AT SAVEETHA SCHOOL OF LAW, SAVEETHA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL AND TECHNICAL SCIENCES (SIMATS), SAVEETHA UNIVERSITY

    BEST CITATION – JEEVA. J, A SOCIO LEGAL ANALYSIS ON THE PERCEPTION/ ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE SAME SEX MARRIAGE IN INDI, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 5 (11) OF 2025, PG. 380-403, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344

    ABSTRACT

    Each individual’s journey through life is unique some will make this journey alone,others in loving relations may be in marriage or other forms of commitment. The term Gay marriage is a marriage marriage between tha partner of same sex. Same-sex marriage alludes to the lawful acknowledgment of the relationship between two man of a similar sex by which freedoms, obligations, and honors concurred to wedded hetero couples are reached out to their equivalent sex partners. As of same-sex marriage can be tracked down in 35 states and DC, and is sanctioned in 17 nations across the world. Equality marriage is marriage between individuals who are of the same legal or biological sex.Same sex marriage as well as marriages were quite prevalent in early medieval times.In Asia same sex attraction has been recorded from ancient times in east, usually between “MEN”. In India,the lopsided speed of legitimizing same-sex marriage has pessimistic outcomes on same-sex families with small kids, exposing them to unjustifiable monetary and profound weigh. Gay marriage is the threat to the institution of marriage. It is believed that same sex marriage undermines the sanctity of marriage.it is an untried social experiment. The main objective of this research is to find out what are all the pros and cons if the sex marriage was legalized in India. There are 200 samples were collected through simple random sampling method. The findings is that the recognition of gay marriage as a human right is gaining increasing support among the activist and the Indian government has not taken any steps to legalise them at the national level.

    KEY WORDS: emotional burden, same-sex, negative consequences, equality, families.

  • A STUDY ON COPYRIGHT OWNERSHIP BY SMALL ENTITIES IN CHENNAI

    A STUDY ON COPYRIGHT OWNERSHIP BY SMALL ENTITIES IN CHENNAI

    AUTHOR – JEEVA. J, STUDENT AT SAVEETHA SCHOOL OF LAW, SAVEETHA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL AND TECHNICAL SCIENCES (SIMATS), SAVEETHA UNIVERSITY

    BEST CITATION – JEEVA. J, A STUDY ON COPYRIGHT OWNERSHIP BY SMALL ENTITIES IN CHENNAI, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 5 (11) OF 2025, PG. 355-379, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344

    ABSTRACT:

    Copyright is generally owned by the creator of the work in the first instance. However, copyright ownership depends on a number of different things such as the type of work created or how the work was created, for example by an employee as part of their job. Determining who owns copyright in a work can be complex.Copyright ownership is separate from owning the physical object/work. Just because you physically own an item does not mean that you will own the copyright in the item. An author or creator may sell you their work, but they will retain ownership of copyright. Unless you made an agreement with the author/creator to transfer copyright, you will not own copyright. The creator will still have the right to reproduce, publish or communicate the work (as well as grant those rights to other people) that you own. If you do not own copyright in the work, you will not be allowed to use it without permission from the author or creator. The study deals with empirical research i.e., non-doctrinal study. It deals with both primary as well as secondary sources of data and various secondary sources like books, articles, research papers etc. were used as reference. The method of collecting is through a direct survey method by people’s opinion and answers to the questionnaires.Convenient sampling method was used for the purpose of this study. There are a total of 200 samples collected with regard to this study.The independent variables are Age, Gender and Education qualification. The statistical tool used is SPSS.

    KEYWORDS: Copyright, publication, registration, ownership, infringement, small entity.

  • PROCEDURAL INEFFICIENCIES THAT BURDEN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN INDIA

    PROCEDURAL INEFFICIENCIES THAT BURDEN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN INDIA

    AUTHOR – ABHISHEK.R.TIWARI, STUDENT AT ILS LAW COLLEGE

    BEST CITATION – ABHISHEK.R.TIWARI, PROCEDURAL INEFFICIENCIES THAT BURDEN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN INDIA, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 5 (11) OF 2025, PG. 349-354, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344

    INTRODUCTION

    The history of Judiciary in India dates long back the period of civilization which was governed by Natural laws or the self proclaimed divine rules. According to these laws and theories, the sovereign had the most legitimate authority to rule a particular territory and they were considered the sole minister of justice, as was believed by the scholars of that era that God himself has granted them the divine right to rule. This was assumed because the Indian society in its budding age was classified on the basis of the occupation (Varna). It was derived from the Ancient Vedic Texts; this was very flexible noble form of division of the society, allowing people to change their social stratum in relation to their proclivity toward a particular line of occupation permitting mobility in their social conditions. This comprehensive system of division of labor and social status promoted harmony and order in the society. This form societal structure also laid down certain moral and theological procedures provisions to resolve conflict in the society if any which were called the rules according to the Dharma or the way life.

  • THE INVISIBLE THREAT: UNDERSTANDING POISON CRIME IN THE COLONIAL ASSAM

    THE INVISIBLE THREAT: UNDERSTANDING POISON CRIME IN THE COLONIAL ASSAM

    AUTHOR – ABHIJEET JAISWAL, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR AT DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY, GURUCHARAN UNIVERSITY, SILCHAR (ASSAM)

    BEST CITATION – ABHIJEET JAISWAL, THE INVISIBLE THREAT: UNDERSTANDING POISON CRIME IN THE COLONIAL ASSAM, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 5 (11) OF 2025, PG. 343-348, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344

    Abstract

    This essay explores the occurrence of poison-related crimes in late nineteenth century Assam, focusing on the movement of toxic substances across various societal domains, including medical practices and the legal system. During this period, Assamese society grappled with what seemed like a surge in poisoning incidents, often involving the use of “aconite” commonly known as “Indian monkshood” or “Bikh”, which held the notorious reputation of being the “king of poisons” in the nineteenth century. From a legal perspective, poisons were insidious tools for carrying out covert murders that proved challenging to prosecute in court. Due to the clandestine nature of poisoning crimes, the testimony of ordinary witnesses was often inadequate, prompting judges to frequently seek the counsel of medical and chemical experts. Consequently, poison in the nineteenth century served multiple roles as an everyday substance, a focus of scientific inquiry, a tool for criminals, a weapon of the vulnerable, and a subject of legal attention. Its meanings and significance varied significantly among different stakeholders, including forensic experts, lawyers, judges, and even poisoners themselves. The essay argues that these movements and interactions were multidirectional, presenting new challenges and complexities for toxicologists in the courtroom. This intricate landscape helps explain why poisoners in the nineteenth century differed significantly from other conventional criminals, not only in terms of gender but also in their social standing. Many poisoners were individuals of respectability who had never before been involved in criminal activities. Some were even close relatives or friends of the victims, allowing them easy access to poisons for domestic purposes and enabling them to administer them discreetly without arousing suspicion.

     Key words : Poisoning, Aconite, Court trial, Forensic Toxicology, Superstition  

  • AN ANALYSIS OF PUNISHMENT AND PENALTIES FOR TAX CRIMES IN INDIA COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH RUSSIA

    AN ANALYSIS OF PUNISHMENT AND PENALTIES FOR TAX CRIMES IN INDIA COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH RUSSIA

    AUTHOR – RITHIK U C, STUDENT AT SAVEETHA SCHOOL OF LAW, SAVEETHA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL AND TECHNICAL SCIENCES, (SIMATS)

    BEST CITATION – RITHIK U C, AN ANALYSIS OF PUNISHMENT AND PENALTIES FOR TAX CRIMES IN INDIA COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH RUSSIA, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 5 (11) OF 2025, PG. 325-342, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344

    ABSTRACT

    This comparative study examines the punishment and penalty frameworks for tax crimes in India and Russia, analyzing their legal structures, enforcement mechanisms, and effectiveness as deterrents. The research explores how these two diverse economies with significant informal sectors address tax evasion and avoidance through their respective legislative and administrative approaches.The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the punishment and penalties for tax crimes in India and Russia, evaluating their effectiveness in deterring tax evasion and ensuring compliance.  Key differences emerge in their definitional boundaries of tax crimes, severity of sanctions, and enforcement priorities, reflecting their distinct legal traditions and policy objectives.Tax crimes are a significant concern for governments worldwide as they undermine economic stability, reduce public revenues, and distort fair competition. Countries impose strict penalties and punishments to deter tax evasion, fraud, and other related offenses. This study examines the legal framework governing tax crimes in India and Russia, analyzing the similarities and differences in their approaches.The objective of the study in to examine the factors that influence the severity of punishment for tax crimes in India and to examine whether the current penalties for tax crimes are well effective.The research method followed here is empirical research and the sample frame is 200 collected in and around chennai.The findings is that in India tax enforcement is largely administrative, with criminal prosecution used in extreme cases. Many cases are settled through penalties rather than imprisonment and in Russia enforcement is more centralized, with strict criminal prosecution of tax offenders. Authorities actively monitor tax payments through digital tracking and banking regulations.In conclusion both India and Russia have well-defined laws for tax crimes, but Russia’s system is more centralized and stringent, while India relies on a combination of administrative penalties, voluntary disclosure schemes, and criminal prosecution in severe cases.Russia imposes harsher penalties, including longer prison sentences and asset confiscation, which act as a stronger deterrent. In contrast, India focuses more on fines and voluntary compliance schemes, making its enforcement more flexible but sometimes less effective in preventing tax evasion.

    KEYWORDS:

    Tax evasion,legal administrative,administrative approaches,banking regulations,economic stability.

  • BETWEEN LIBERTY AND LIABILITY: SECTION 66A 2.0, REIMAGINING FOR THE DIGITAL FREE SPEECH BOUNDARIES

    BETWEEN LIBERTY AND LIABILITY: SECTION 66A 2.0, REIMAGINING FOR THE DIGITAL FREE SPEECH BOUNDARIES

    AUTHOR – MR. PRATEEK DUBEY* & MR. ADITYA CHANDRAKANT GHUGE**

    * (B.TECH, LL.B, MSW*), SENIOR TECHNICAL SPECIALIST AT UNIVERSITY OF LUCKNOW
    ** (B.TECH, LL.M, MBA, MSW*, PHD*), CYBER LAW EXPERT AT MAHARASHTRA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, MUMBAI

    BEST CITATION – MR. PRATEEK DUBEY & MR. ADITYA CHANDRAKANT GHUGE, BETWEEN LIBERTY AND LIABILITY: SECTION 66A 2.0, REIMAGINING FOR THE DIGITAL FREE SPEECH BOUNDARIES, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 5 (11) OF 2025, PG. 317-324, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344

    Abstract

    In 2015, India’s Supreme Court nullified Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 due to its problematic ambiguity and disproportionately restrictive nature on free speech. Almost ten years later, India has entered an era marred by technologically exacerbated harms such as AI deepfakes, voice scams, highly orchestrated hate campaigns, and even psychological cyberbullying. This paper claims that the need for a constitutionally compliant cyber speech regulation framework is urgent. Addressing current challenges and global best practices alongside the legal void, the paper seeks to propose an amended Section 66A that upholds constitutional liberties alongside digital dignity, neutralism, foresight, and technological anticipation.

  • AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON CYBER CRIMES AGAINST WOMEN IN INDIA

    AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON CYBER CRIMES AGAINST WOMEN IN INDIA

    AUTHOR – JERIN RAJAH.R, STUDENT AT SAVEETHA SCHOOL OF LAW, SAVEETHA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI

    BEST CITATION – JERIN RAJAH.R, AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON CYBER CRIMES AGAINST WOMEN IN INDIA, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 5 (11) OF 2025, PG. 302-316, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344

    ABSTRACT

    “You can’t always trust a cloud not to rain, don’t always trust one to protect your data ”- Today all over the world cyber-crimes are increasing at a higher rate and the soft targets are women and children. Even by the National crime record bureau – it was held that the cybercrime rate against women has increased to the higher cases from around 3000 cases to 6000 cases. Some of the cyber-crimes committed against women are defamation, cyber stalking, email spoofing, morphing of images for pornography content etc The main objective of this study is to find the causation behind the victimisation of women, To analysis the laws dealing with cybercrimes against women – and the effective functioning of those provisions, To find out loopholes in the laws, To study on the steps to be taken to reduce cybercrimes against women ,To study on the relationship between cybercrime against women and right to privacy .Samples are collected through convenient sampling method, sample frame – India ( empirical study )Through this research we found that the major causes of increase in cybercrimes in India – poverty ,negligence, easy access system, today we have various legislations in India like Indian penal code 1860, Information and technology act 2000, Indecent representation of women prohibition act 1986 and various other provisions but there are few areas which intervene the effective functioning of the provisions – ineffective coverage of many emerging issues , weak implementation of the laws ,less rate of conviction, There is the positive relation between commission of the cybercrime and violation of right to privacy of the victim and also suggests that there should be comprehensive cyber law act should be enacted and special penal laws to deal with cybercrimes investigation and evidence issues.

    KEYWORDS:

    Cyber, crimes, internet, women, victims.

  • WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT OF 2014: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS AND AN URGENT NEED OF REFORM

    WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT OF 2014: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS AND AN URGENT NEED OF REFORM

    AUTHOR – LUCKY KUSHWAHA, STUDENT AT RTMNU’S DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR SCHOOL OF LAW

    BEST CITATION – LUCKY KUSHWAHA, WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT OF 2014: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS AND AN URGENT NEED OF REFORM, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 5 (11) OF 2025, PG. 294-287, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344

    ABSTRACT

    The Whistleblower Protection Act of 2014 was enacted to strengthen protections for federal employees who expose government misconduct, aiming to encourage accountability and transparency within federal agencies. This critical analysis examines the effectiveness of the Act, highlighting its achievements and the persistent challenges faced by whistleblowers, such as retaliation and lack of real safeguards. Despite improvements over previous legislation, the Act falls short in providing adequate legal protections, effective mechanisms for reporting, and sufficient remedies for whistleblowers. Furthermore, the underwhelming response from federal agencies to reported disclosures raises concerns about the genuine commitment to fostering a culture of transparency. This analysis reinforces the urgent need for reform to enhance protections, streamline the reporting processes, and ensure that whistleblowers can safely and effectively carry out their civic duty without fear of damages.

    Keywords: Whistleblower Protection Act, Federal Employees, Misconduct, Accountability, Transparency, Safeguards, Reform.

  • OPPRESSION OF WOMEN: THE DESIDERATUM OF UCC

    OPPRESSION OF WOMEN: THE DESIDERATUM OF UCC

    AUTHOR – ASMITA SINGH* & DR. AXITA SRIVASTAVA**

    * LAW STUDENT AT AMITY LAW SCHOOL LUCKNOW, AMITY UNIVERSITY UTTAR PRADESH

    ** PROFESSOR AT AMITY LAW SCHOOL LUCKNOW, AMITY UNIVERSITY UTTAR PRADESH

    BEST CITATION – ASMITA SINGH & DR. AXITA SRIVASTAVA, OPPRESSION OF WOMEN: THE DESIDERATUM OF UCC, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 5 (11) OF 2025, PG. 288-293, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344

    Abstract

    The question that arises here is that even after 75 years of Independence does women of independent India enjoys their rights at the full extent. As we all know that in the present legal system the personal laws govern the matters related to marriage, divorce, inheritance and succession and it is quite clear that there is connivance between the personal laws and patriarchy. Presently, due to the political situation women’s rights continues to be conquered by the discussion of majority and minority in the sake of vote bank policy, there is a need to make a paradigm shift towards the protection of rights of women. It has been seen very often that somewhere the Gender Equality stands settled by personal laws in India and in the sake of the political vote bank even the legislature don’t dare to amend the discriminatory personal laws.

    UCC which means uniform law for all is envisaged under Article 44 of the Constitution of India which states that “it is the duty of the State to secure for the citizen a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India.”[1]. UCC forecast the idea of governing all people belonging to different religion and regions under same law. The eminent feature of UCC is that it has the ability to restore the concept of women empowerment which India always concerned about. It aims to replace the customary personal laws which are discriminatory on the basis of gender. This paper tries to analyze the oppression of women under personal laws and how it can be curbed out by the implication of UCC. This paper will also put a light on the history of personal laws and different landmark cases which dealt with the constitutionality of particular provisions of personal laws. Keywords: Personal laws, UCC, Women, Rights, Oppression


    [1] INDIA CONST. Art. 44

  • GROWING ISSUE OF VIOLENCE AGAINST MEN

    GROWING ISSUE OF VIOLENCE AGAINST MEN

    AUTHOR – NISTHA MISHRA & ABHYUDAY RAM TRIPATHI, STUDENTS AT AMITY UNIVERSITY LUCKNOW CAMPUS

    BEST CITATION – NISTHA MISHRA & ABHYUDAY RAM TRIPATHI, GROWING ISSUE OF VIOLENCE AGAINST MEN, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 5 (11) OF 2025, PG. 280-287, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344.

    The Indian Constitution, in Article 14, states that all individuals should be treated equally under the law, without any discrimination based on caste, race, religion, place of birth, or gender. It also ensures that every individual, irrespective of gender, has the fundamental right to protection of life and personal freedom, as detailed in Article 21, which has been expanded by the Supreme Court (SC) through numerous cases as required. The term ‘right to life and personal liberty’ encompasses multiple dimensions, including but not limited to the right to work, the right to a clean and healthy environment, the right to a secure workplace, the right to a fair trial, and the right to privacy, as clarified by the SC on various occasions.