TEST IDENTIFICATION PARADE- A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN INDIA AND USA
AUTHORS – JIA MALHOTRA & NAVYA ARORA, STUDENT AT BENNETT UNIVERSITY
BEST CITATION – JIA MALHOTRA & NAVYA ARORA, TEST IDENTIFICATION PARADE- A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN INDIA AND USA, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 4 (2) OF 2024, PG. 1253-1260, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344.
ABSTRACT
This study offers a comprehensive comparative examination of Test Identification Parade (TIP) norms in the United States and India, two separate legal systems with by differing cultural and legislative backgrounds. The process of TIP, which is crucial in criminal investigations, entails the identification of suspects by means of interrogating witnesses. The essay delves into the complexities of implementing and regulating TIP in different countries, taking into account various elements such as legislative regulations, judicial precedents, and law enforcement methods. The essay explores the historical and legal development of TIP by analysing landmark cases like Ramanathan
v. State of Tamil Nadu[1] in India and United States v. Wade in the USA[2]. In addition, by conducting a thorough comparison analysis, this study examines variations in procedural safeguards, and also draws focus on the criticisms and challenges faced by each process of the respective countries. Its objective is to identify both similarities and distinctions between the two systems. In essence, this comparative analysis aims to enhance our understanding of TIP practices in different countries and provide insights for prospective reforms that prioritizes fairness, justice, and procedural integrity in criminal identification processes.
[1] 1985 AIR SC 660
[2] 230 F. Supp.2d 1298 Docket No. 6:95CR140ORL22JGG