NEED OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): KEEPING DISPUTES OUT OF COURT ROOM
AUTHORS – JAHANVI BHARDWAJ* & PROF. (DR.) RAJESH BAHUGUNA**
*STUDENT, LAW COLLEGE DEHRADUN, FACULTY OF UTTARANCHAL UNIVERSITY, DEHRADUN, UTTARAKHAND
** PRO VICE-CHANCELLOR, UTTARANCHAL UNIVERSITY, DEHRADUN, UTTARAKHAND
BEST CITATION – JAHANVI BHARDWAJ & PROF. (DR.) RAJESH BAHUGUNA, CONFLICT OF LAW RULES, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 4 (2) OF 2024, PG. 305-314, APIS â 3920 â 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344.
INTRODUCTION
It is the spirit and not the form of law that keeps justice alive.âLJ Earl Warren .
Life is full of arguments, but survival is key. Neutral conflicts do have beauty. Resolving them amicably is what we call dispute resolution. Traditional negotiation uses ADR to resolve disputes. The Indian legal system uses ADR to resolve interparty conflicts more efficiently and cheaply. The name implies that ADR is an alternative to the legal system. Traditional aggressive litigation that causes stress is replaced by this. ADR strives to resolve disputes promptly and effectively in overburdened courts[1]. ADR programmes increase globally, enabling new system uses and designs. Effective modules improve lives and achieve societal goals. This study will examine ADR processes, their provisions in India and abroad, and their distinctiveness, execution, and problems that prevails in India along with suitable solutions [2].
[1] 1P.C.RAO &WILLIAM SHEFFIELD, ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION, 1997 EDITION , PG NO.45
[2] 222nd Law Commission Report