EVALUATING THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF COORDINATED ELECTIONS IN INDIA: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE “ONE NATION, ONE ELECTION” PROPOSAL

AUTHOR – SAMEER KUMAR, STUDENT AT GLOBAL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF LAW & JURISPRUDENCE

BEST CITATION – SAMEER KUMAR, EVALUATING THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF COORDINATED ELECTIONS IN INDIA: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE “ONE NATION, ONE ELECTION” PROPOSAL, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 4 (4) OF 2024, PG. 236-245, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344.

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the implications—both favourable and unfavourable—of instituting synchronized elections across India, often termed “One Nation, One Election.” This proposed change aims to align the timing of national, state, and local elections to minimize frequent electoral cycles. The study finds that harmonizing polls could lead to substantial cost reductions for both state and central administrations, as it would lower expenses associated with election management, security measures, and governance interruptions. Annual savings are projected to exceed ₹45 billion. The effect on state governments presents a dual narrative: while national issues might overshadow regional matters, state authorities could gain more time to focus on governance rather than campaigning. Voters might experience reduced fatigue but would also lose the opportunity to voice discontent with state governments at staggered intervals. For businesses, coordinated elections could offer greater policy consistency and reduced political unpredictability. However, the risk of prolonged single-party dominance might lead to diminished government oversight. Additionally, national parties are likely to gain an advantage over regional parties. Overall, synchronized elections could enhance governance efficiency and contribute to political and economic stability. Nevertheless, the potential drawbacks, such as diminished regional autonomy and reduced governmental accountability, pose significant concerns. The analysis concludes that while the benefits of synchronized elections are notable, addressing potential negative impacts on regional representation and accountability may necessitate further electoral reforms. This summary encapsulates the essential findings of the full analysis, shedding light on the multifaceted considerations involved in evaluating this significant electoral reform proposal.