ANIMAL SACRIFICE: A BELIEF OR MISUTILISED PRACTICE

ANIMAL SACRIFICE: A BELIEF OR MISUTILISED PRACTICE

ANIMAL SACRIFICE: A BELIEF OR MISUTILISED PRACTICE

AUTHOR – ASTHA DAS, STUDENT AT CHRIST UNIVERSITY

BEST CITATION – ASTHA DAS, ANIMAL SACRIFICE: A BELIEF OR MISUTILISED PRACTICE, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 4 (1) OF 2024, PG. 526-530, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344

ABSTRACT

The abstract explores the historical and cultural significance of animal sac, examining its practice in ancient Greece and Rome as well as in Vedic and Hindu traditions in India. It highlights the role of sac as a means of communication with divine beings, seeking their favor, protection, or appeasement. The study delves into the rituals, materials, timing, and techniques associated with sacrifice across different religious contexts. Furthermore, it discusses the concept of vegan utilitarianism, analyzing its divergence from conventional veganism and its moral implications regarding animal welfare. Drawing on philosophical perspectives and ethical arguments, the abstract suggests that utilitarianism offers a compelling rationale for minimizing animal suff, even advocating for radical measures like the extinction of carnivorous species. Ultimately, it underscores the complex interplay between religious practices, ethical theo, and hum attitudes toward animals throughout history.

Keywords: Sac- Sacrifice, Suff- Suffering, Theo-Theories, Hum-Humans