THE IMPACT OF DIGITALISATION (AI) ON ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION MAKING PROCESS AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE

AUTHORS JAGADIP T & ABRARUL ATHIF, STUDENTS AT THE TAMIL NADU, DR. AMBEDKAR LAW UNIVERSITY (TNDALU), SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE IN LAW (SOEL).

BEST CITATION – JAGADIP T & ABRARUL ATHIF, THE IMPACT OF DIGITALISATION (AI) ON ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION MAKING PROCESS AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 4 (4) OF 2024, PG. 123-133, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344.

ABSTRACT                               

Good administration is the foundation for fair and effective government action. In recent times, the digitalization of  executive processes has come decreasingly  current,  promising  effectiveness,  translucency, and enhanced availability. The Nordic countries, known for their advanced digital societies,  give a unique perspective to study the  goods of  digitalization on  executive decision- making processes and access to justice, particularly in the  environment of advanced  weal  countries and robust legal systems. This study investigates  the multifaceted impact of digitalization on  executive decision- making processes and access to justice with a particular focus on Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, and Iceland. It delves into how digitalization has  converted  executive decision- making processes, analysing the  eventuality for increased  effectiveness, streamlined workflows, and enhanced data- driven decision-  timber. Through a comprehensive analysis of policy  fabrics, legal  structures, and empirical data, this  exploration seeks to  interpret the ways in which digital  technologies are reshaping  executive practices and  impacting the delivery of justice. The study begins by examining the  elaboration of digitalization in Nordic  executive laws,  fastening on e government  enterprise and digital technology integration. It explores its  counteraccusations  for  executive decision- making processes, including procedural fairness,  executive discretion, and automated decision- making algorithms. By  espousing a  relative approach, this study aims to identify common trends, challenges, and   openings presented by digitalization in Nordic  executive systems, offering  perceptivity that are  material to both indigenous policymakers and global stakeholders navigating the  complications of digital governance. Eventually, this  exploration contributes to a deeper  understanding of the complex relationship between digitalization,  executive decision-  timber, and access to justice in Nordic States, offering  perceptivity that are  material to ongoing debates  girding  executive modernization and legal  invention in the digital age.