POST DECISIONS HEARING

AUTHOR – R. THILAK, N G THANESH & P SANTHOSH PANDIYAN, STUDENTS AT TAMIL NADU DR.AMBEDKAR LAW UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE IN LAW

BEST CITATION – R. THILAK, N G THANESH & P SANTHOSH PANDIYAN, CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ROLE OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN INDIAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 4 (3) OF 2024, PG. 303-306, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344.

Abstract:

                The primary aim of law is to provide justice. One of the main objectives in providing justice is the principles of natural justice, which provide impartial and fair justice. Principles of Natural justice also protect arbitrary use of power by administrative authorities.Principles of natural justice include Audi alteram  partem,  Nemo Judex casua sua, and Reasoned decision. In this one major part is the Audi alteram partem, which covers post decisional hearing, which emerged after landmark judgment named Menaka Gandhi V UOI. In this article, Post decisional hearing was dealt in detail and its impact in affecting the principle of natural justice and case laws relating to it, which gave the decision that Post decisional hearing is of exceptional in nature.

Keywords: Principle of natural  justice, Nemo Judex causa sua, Audi alteram  partem  and  etc.