“COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ARBITRATION LAWS : SUBSTANTIVE & PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVES”

AUTHOR – MUTHU MAYAN R, AMITY LAW SCHOOL, AMITY UNIVERSITY, NOIDA

BEST CITATION – MUTHU MAYAN R, “COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ARBITRATION LAWS : SUBSTANTIVE & PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVES”, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 5 (10) OF 2025, PG. 660-667, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344.

CHAPTER 3 : COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ARBITRATION LAWS

Arbitration is a widely used mechanism for resolving disputes, particularly in international trade and commerce. As businesses and individuals engage in cross-border transactions, the need for a neutral and efficient system for resolving conflicts becomes paramount. Arbitration offers several advantages over traditional litigation, including flexibility, confidentiality, and a speedier resolution process. However, the success of arbitration is often influenced by the legal framework within which it operates. Different countries have varying arbitration laws that can significantly impact the arbitration process, affecting everything from the appointment of arbitrators to the enforcement of awards. This comparative analysis aims to examine the differences in arbitration laws across various jurisdictions, highlighting both substantive and procedural variations and their implications for international dispute resolution.