FIXED TERM EMPLOYMENT AND JOB SECURITY: A DOUBLE EDGED SWORD

FIXED TERM EMPLOYMENT AND JOB SECURITY: A DOUBLE EDGED SWORD

FIXED TERM EMPLOYMENT AND JOB SECURITY: A DOUBLE EDGED SWORD

AUTHOR – S.NIVETHALAKSHMI, STUDENT AT THE TAMIL NADU DR. AMBEDKAR LAW UNIVERSITY, SOEL

BEST CITATION – S.NIVETHALAKSHMI, FIXED TERM EMPLOYMENT AND JOB SECURITY: A DOUBLE EDGED SWORD, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 5 (5) OF 2025, PG. 337-341, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344

ABSTRACT

The idea of fixed-term employment has become more popular in India as a result of labour reforms meant to encourage investment and increase workforce flexibility.  The protection of employee rights and long-term job security are major concerns, even if it enables companies to control labour costs and adapt to shifting market needs.  This paper critically analyses the legislative framework pertaining to fixed-term employment, specifically as it relates to the Industrial Relations Code of 2020[1], and considers its effects on social security, job stability, and ethical labour practices.  The study uses a doctrinal and socio-legal approach to show how, depending on how they are used and enforced, fixed-term contracts can be both an opportunity and a source of exploitation.  It also discusses the difficulties in striking a balance between worker protection and economic flexibility. Highlighting the need for more robust protections and changes to policies. According to the study’s findings, fixed-term employment frequently works against the goals of justice and labour welfare, even though it may be advantageous in theory.

Keywords: Economic rights, worker protection, flexible work arrangements, job security, labour law, the Industrial Relations Code, job security, fixed-term employment, employment policy, and socio-legal research.


[1] The Industrial Relations Code, No. 35 of 2020, Acts of Parliament, 2020 (India).